1) How could the funding have been used to improve the failing Cleveland schools instead of being pulled from the public school system and used in the private religious schools?
2) Do you feel it is constitutionally sound for the court to have decided that it is the individual's right to take public education funds and use them for private religious schools?
3) How do you see the merits of this case playing a role in the issue of funding and school choice today?
1) How could the funding have been used to improve the failing Cleveland schools instead of being pulled from the public school system and used in the private religious schools?
2) Do you feel it is constitutionally sound for the court to have decided that it is the individual's right to take public education funds and use them for private religious schools?
3) How do you see the merits of this case playing a role in the issue of funding and school choice today?